47 results for 'cat:"Employment" AND cat:"Class Action" AND cat:"Labor"'.
J. Volk grants the coal miner's post-trial motion to file a retainer agreement under seal, and the order awarding attorneyfees and expenses in the successful class action brought against the two management and three coal companies for violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act. The companies failed to provide notice to the full-time employees of the Burke Mountain Mine Complex in McDowell County of an impending lay-off of more than 50 employees in October 2019. The court amends its judgment order to include the language "This judgment applies to the 164 miners to whom Rule 23(c)(2) notice was directed, none of whom has requested exclusion, and whom the Court finds to be members of the certified class in this matter" and reflect a total award of $1,738,743, a statutory fee award of $110,992 and $45,593 in expenses, and $15,000 to the miner as class representative service fee, with an order to file an amended notice of class judgment by April 15. Additionally, the court denies the companies' renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative a new trial.
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Volk, Filed On: March 31, 2024, Case #: 5:20cv165, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Donnell declines to enter judgment in favor of the U.S. Department of Labor on the department’s Fair Labor Standards Act complaint alleging two companies, which provide “spotholding” services for a New York energy company, willfully misclassified its employees as independent contractors to get out of paying overtime wages. The court is unable to make a determination as to whether the litigants were in fact employees or independent contractors.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Donnelly, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv57, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Dudek partially grants the employees' motion to certify a class in their proposed class action alleging failures to pay minimum and overtime wages. The employees have shown that there is a desire among other employees to opt in to their suit and that the proposed collective members are similarly situated with regard to their pay provisions and job requirements. A request for expedited discovery, seeking a complete list of people and entities the employers employed to provide security in the relevant job sites, is proper, but a request to toll the statute of limitations to run from the date this action was filed is denied since the existing statute of limitations period is not scheduled to trigger for six months and the employees have not shown that acceleration of that period is necessary.
Court: USDC Middle District of Florida, Judge: Dudek, Filed On: March 26, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv544, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Wolson grants in part a paralegal’s motion to certify a collective action against the City of Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office alleging it misclassifies paralegals as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and that they should get overtime pay. Conditional certification of her collective action is appropriate, although it is not appropriate for the court to certify it to proceed as a class action.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Wolson, Filed On: March 18, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv32, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Pulliam adopts a report and recommendations and denies partial summary judgment to a oilfield services company after it was sued by former workers in a class action for allegedly failing to pay overtime. At dispute in this case is whether employee pay by the company constitutes “a salary plus a bonus or a salary plus a day rate.” The company argued that a previous judge failed to comply with precedent on wage laws, but in fact it is the company that misreads precedent.
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Pulliam, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 5:21cv142, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Douglas grants the rehab center's petition for panel rehearing on the district court's determination a collective action may proceed under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The district court applied the incorrect legal standard assessing employee status. Furthermore, evidence that calculations could be completed on a class-wide basis by the proposed method is undeveloped, and the district court did not engage directly with the center's offset defense, as required for certification.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Douglas , Filed On: February 9, 2024, Case #: 22-20434, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Rowland denies a delivery company’s motion to dismiss a class of workers’ claims that it violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act. The court also grants the workers’ motion for conditional class certification. The class representatives claim that, from 2020 to 2022, the delivery company wrongly classified them as independent contractors to avoid providing them with the pay, protections and benefits employees enjoy. The court finds the class representatives have sufficiently alleged those claims and have shown sufficient evidence that they are among a class of similarly situated workers for the delivery company.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: February 7, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1859, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Pratter grants final approval of this class action settlement between the Democratic National Committee and its workers during the 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020 elections in this suit over underpayment of overtime wages. The $3.5 million settlement is fair and reasonable.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Pratter, Filed On: February 6, 2024, Case #: 2:16cv5800, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Duffin partially grants the employee's motion to certify class for his lawsuit alleging the waste management company did not pay him and other garbage truck drivers proper overtime by failing to include bonuses in the overtime calculation and did not compensate them for time they spent inspecting their trucks before they clocked in for their shifts. The employee's motion for conditional certification is denied for drivers who inspected their trucks before clocking in and beginning their scheduled trips, but the motion is granted as to all drivers who received a bonus on or after October 3, 2020.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Wisconsin, Judge: Duffin, Filed On: January 29, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv504, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Reyers conditionally certifies a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action against the owners of two gas stations for unpaid wages. The litigant, a gas station attendant, sufficiently shows there are other, similarly situated employees who may have been victims of a common policy.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Reyes, Filed On: January 26, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv5475, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Seybert approves in full a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and tosses a teacher’s putative class action with claims for fraud, unpaid wages, deceptive business practices and retaliation against an online teaching platform. He alleges the platform engaged in fraud by enticing him to provide English language instruction to students living in China in order to obtain his biometric data for use in its AI technology without his knowledge or consent. The teacher’s claims against the online teaching platform are bound by his arbitration agreement and all other claims against affiliated entities are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Seybert, Filed On: January 25, 2024, Case #: 2:20cv6370, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: class Action, employment Retaliation, labor
J. Dever denies a former Butterball turkey worker’s motion for equitable tolling in this suit he brought against Butterball for its failure to pay overtime wages. The worker claims the court delayed its rulings on Butterball’s motions to dismiss, but as the court timely ruled on those motions, he fails to prove that these circumstances were extraordinary. Also, the worker has not identified the class of his coworkers who would benefit from the relief sought.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Dever, Filed On: January 10, 2024, Case #: 5:20cv585, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Hillman denies a freight forwarder's motion for summary judgment against its employees, who are suing it for allegedly unlawfully deducting wages from their pay. The freight forwarder can factor damages into its overall delivery rate, but not deduct damages from its employees' paychecks.
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Hillman, Filed On: December 21, 2023, Case #: 4:18cv11905, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Battaglia grants class certification as to a minimum wage, overtime, and meal break subclasses in the employees' labor action against the shipyard. Common questions predominate individualized issues in these subclasses. However, certification is denied for the two reimbursement subclasses. The employees offer no way of determining on a class-wide basis when or to what extent class members incurred unreimbursed business expenses. Each class member's claimed expenses would need to be scrutinized individually.
Court: USDC Southern District of California, Judge: Battaglia, Filed On: December 6, 2023, Case #: 3:21cv2122, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Lanza grants a class of employees' motion for preliminary certification for Fair Labor Standard Act claims brought against an appliance company. The delivery and installation employees, former and current, sufficiently showed in court that the employer underpaid them after classifying them as independent contractors without prior negotiations.
Court: USDC Arizona, Judge: Lanza, Filed On: November 17, 2023, Case #: 2:22cv798, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Nardacci grants final approval to a class action settlement agreement to resolve a group of maintenance workers’ unpaid wages lawsuit brought against their employer, a property management company. The employer agrees to pay $175,000, plus a $7,500 service fee and $57,750 in attorney fees, to settle claims that it failed to pay their workers’ straight time wages and overtime compensation.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Nardacci, Filed On: October 25, 2023, Case #: 5:22cv207, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Boyle grants a class of migrant farm workers’ motion for certification in this Fair Labor Standards Act suit against their employers, which allegedly did not pay for their temporary work visas, travel or the wage agreed upon for hours worked, and the employers allegedly confiscated the workers’ Social Security cards and passports. The class members have shown sufficient evidence of the employers’ violations of Act and are also granted their motion for disclosure of contact information of potential opt-in class members.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Boyle, Filed On: October 25, 2023, Case #: 5:22cv491, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor
J. Bucklo grants an exotic dancer’s motion to dismiss breach of contract and specific performance counterclaims, which her former employer, a strip club, has brought against her. The court also denies the strip club’s motion to remove the exotic dancer as the representative of the putative class pursuing this labor action against it. The dancer, speaking for her class, claims the club wrongly classifies its workers as contractors rather than employees in order to deny them fair pay and benefits, and forces them to hand over a portion of the tips they earn on the job. The club countered that the dancers breached their contracts by failing to accurately record all their tips, but the court finds the club has not shown it has suffered any material harm from this alleged omission. The court also finds the club has not put forward a sufficient reason to exclude the dancer as her class representative.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Bucklo, Filed On: October 13, 2023, Case #: 1:20cv5321, NOS: Fair Labor Standards Act - Labor, Categories: employment, class Action, labor